Re: Remaining Streaming Replication Open Items

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining Streaming Replication Open Items
Date: 2010-04-08 10:58:39
Message-ID: q2o603c8f071004080358mbb01b226ne2e435422608c80f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> OK, that looks a lot less risky than I had understood from discussions.
>>> The main thing for me is it doesn't interfere with Startup or
>>> WalReceiver, so assuming it works I've got no objections. Thanks for
>>> chasing this down, good addition.
>>
>> Thanks.  Committed.
>
> Thanks. The following TODO item should be removed?
>
> "Redefine smart shutdown in standby mode to exist as soon as all
> read-only connections are gone."
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Standby_server_mode
>
> Or change it to something like?
>
> "Change smart shutdown in standby mode so that it kills the startup
>  and walreceiver process before waiting for the regular backends to die off"

Yeah, we should do one of those two things, but I don't much care which.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2010-04-08 11:05:11 Re: Feature request: limited deletions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-04-08 10:57:16 Re: A maze of twisty mailing lists all the same