Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com" <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com" <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
Date: 2019-03-26 09:32:21
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday, March 26, 2019 3:20 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:57:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > In short, I'm not convinced that most of this patch is an improvement
> > on the status quo. I think we'd be best off to just take the idea
> > of explicitly mentioning adding --jobs to a manual run, ie roughly
> Yeah, no objections from here to keep that stuff the simpler the
> better. So I am on board with your suggestion.

+1, I'd rather have that as "documentation" after an upgrade.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-03-26 09:54:47 Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-03-26 09:30:39 Re: psql display of foreign keys