| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com" <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb |
| Date: | 2019-03-26 02:20:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20190326022007.GO2558@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:57:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In short, I'm not convinced that most of this patch is an improvement
> on the status quo. I think we'd be best off to just take the idea
> of explicitly mentioning adding --jobs to a manual run, ie roughly
Yeah, no objections from here to keep that stuff the simpler the
better. So I am on board with your suggestion.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-26 02:26:58 | Re: pg_basebackup ignores the existing data directory permissions |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-03-26 02:18:09 | Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] |