Re: .gitignore files, take two

From: James Cloos <cloos(at)jhcloos(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: .gitignore files, take two
Date: 2010-10-10 00:27:22
Message-ID: m339seevst.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'm reading this a bit late, but...

We (Xorg) found that ignoring:

*~
*.bak
*.patch

in addition to the files generated by building is very helpful.

We do use git tag and git describe in the make dist process, as
well as git log >ChangeLog. That may be relevant; avoiding git
describe's dirty designation is important when using it in that
fashion. But it helps to be able to run git add --all cleanly.

I understand that other git users have similar experience.

-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos(at)jhcloos(dot)com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-10-10 01:47:34 Re: Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Neil Whelchel 2010-10-09 23:26:18 Slow count(*) again...