Re: is sync rep stalled?

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: is sync rep stalled?
Date: 2010-10-01 15:06:39
Message-ID: m2y6ai3qbk.fsf@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I proposed to implement the "return-immediately" at first because it doesn't
> require standby registration. But if many people think that the "wait-forever"
> is the core rather than the "return-immediately", I'll follow them. We can
> implement the "return-immediately" after that.

Wait forever can be done without standby registration, with quorum commit.

--
dim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-01 15:08:00 Re: wip: functions median and percentile
Previous Message Hitoshi Harada 2010-10-01 15:00:35 Re: wip: functions median and percentile