From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: is sync rep stalled? |
Date: | 2010-10-04 07:08:06 |
Message-ID: | 4CA97D56.4000605@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/01/2010 05:06 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Wait forever can be done without standby registration, with quorum commit.
Yeah, I also think the only reason for standby registration is ease of
configuration (if at all). There's no technical requirement for standby
registration, AFAICS. Or does anybody know of a realistic use case
that's possible with standby registration, but not with quorum commit?
Regards
Markus Wanner
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-10-04 07:18:09 | Re: is sync rep stalled? |
Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2010-10-04 07:03:28 | Re: is sync rep stalled? |