| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: missing schema qualifications in psql |
| Date: | 2010-04-01 15:19:26 |
| Message-ID: | m2x603c8f071004010819pb96c4274rcfb8ac126d04defd@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> While psql is careful to schema-qualify all references to built-in
>> objects (pg_catalog.*), it completely neglects to do this for built-in
>> operators,
>
> That's intentional because of the utter lack of readability that
> results if you try to use OPERATOR() everywhere ...
I was mulling over in my head the possibility that the date on which
this patch was posted was deliberate...
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tv | 2010-04-01 15:39:37 | Re: Postgres 9.1 - Release Theme |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-01 14:40:25 | Re: Feature request - function-based deferrable uniques. |