Re: missing schema qualifications in psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: missing schema qualifications in psql
Date: 2010-04-01 13:59:38
Message-ID: 15211.1270130378@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> While psql is careful to schema-qualify all references to built-in
> objects (pg_catalog.*), it completely neglects to do this for built-in
> operators,

That's intentional because of the utter lack of readability that
results if you try to use OPERATOR() everywhere ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-04-01 14:04:47 Re: [SPAM]Re: Questions about 9.0 release note
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-04-01 13:51:59 Re: pgsql: Add contraint exclusion section to contraint docs.