| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_reorg in core? |
| Date: | 2012-09-25 19:42:16 |
| Message-ID: | m2r4pp7uuf.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> For me, the Postgres user interface should include
> * REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
> * CLUSTER CONCURRENTLY
> * ALTER TABLE CONCURRENTLY
> and also that autovacuum would be expanded to include REINDEX and
> CLUSTER, renaming it to automaint.
FWIW, +1 to all those user requirements, and for not having pg_reorg
simply moved as-is nearer to core. I would paint the shed "autoheal",
maybe.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-09-25 19:55:39 | Re: Oid registry |
| Previous Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2012-09-25 18:28:49 | Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes |