| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |
| Date: | 2011-02-03 15:31:08 |
| Message-ID: | m2lj1x879f.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
> Hmm, how about allowing a list of files to execute? That allows the
Sure. I still don't see why doing it in the control file is better than
in the Makefile, even if it's already better than in the SQL script, at
least in terms of code to write to support the idea.
Speaking about which, using Make rules to prepare your upgrade files
from other pieces means no development at all on the backend side. You
can hardly beat that.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-03 15:31:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-03 15:30:31 | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |