Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Date: 2011-02-03 15:30:31
Message-ID: AANLkTin+LsJQ+PjHAe=x6_hizcEMYJ4ZeVqk2YM2O-MR@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Ross J. Reedstrom <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> wrote:
>> Example:
>>
>> upgrade_from_1_0 = '1.0 => upgrade_from_1.0.sql'
>> upgrade_from_2_0 = '2.0 => upgrade_from_2.0.sql'
>> upgrade_from_3_0 = '3.0 => upgrade_from_3.0.sql'
>
> Hmm, how about allowing a list of files to execute? That allows the
> developer to create modularized sql, and composite it in the config:
>
> for a mythical version 4.0:
>
> 1.0 => add_foobar_table.sql new_method_baz.sql
> 2.0 => drop_method_baz.sql add_quuz_table.sql
> # oops, we still needed this
> 3.0 => new_method_baz.sql
>
> I know when I'm developing such upgrades, the code looks like that,
> until I need to shoehorn them into the upgrade systems idea of version
> numbers matching names to find scripts to run.

Good idea. My code looks that way too.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-02-03 15:31:08 Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2011-02-03 14:53:04 Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3