Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?
Date: 2013-10-09 14:05:40
Message-ID: m2li22bkuj.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think we were going to try to group the extensions into categories
> (debugging tools, demonstration code, data types, etc.) and maybe
> encourage packagers to put the debugging tools in the same OS package
> as the core server. But Tom was not supportive, and he was at the
> time the packager for Red Hat, so it didn't seem like we were going to
> get to far with it.

My understanding is that we wanted to promote some extensions as being
"core extensions" and change the directory and documentation layout to
encourage packagers to rethink they work.

And my understanding of Tom's reaction is that he didn't believe the
source directory layout has anything to do with the packaging problem,
we should just document the extensions we want installed by default and
packagers will know to follow us there.

Still, *something* needs to be done here.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2013-10-09 14:19:36 Re: WITHIN GROUP patch
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-10-09 13:52:29 Re: Patch: FORCE_NULL option for copy COPY in CSV mode