| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Backup docs |
| Date: | 2012-06-16 16:13:37 |
| Message-ID: | m2fw9vgrpq.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> This is copied from the old documentation. It used to say "It is not
> necessary to be concerned about the amount of time elapsed between
> pg_start_backup and the start of the actual backup, nor between the
> end of the backup and pg_stop_backup".
>
> And the whole idea was to simplify the text at the beginning ;)
Oh I see, not your patch to fix then. I just quick read the diff, as you
can see.
> This is copied exactly from what it is today. I'm sure it can be
> approved, but it's not the goal of this patch. Let's not let
> perfection get in the way of improvement...
Same.
> It does, it's under "standalone hot backups". The second to last part
> of the patch.
Perfect then.
Sorry for the noise, regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ktm@rice.edu | 2012-06-16 16:25:12 | Re: libpq compression |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-16 15:30:38 | Re: Pg default's verbosity? |