| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unresolved bugs |
| Date: | 2010-01-06 22:08:04 |
| Message-ID: | m23a2isx8b.fsf@hi-media.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> If we're going to use a bug-tracker, Bugzilla wouldn't be my first
> choice, I don't think. Honestly what I'd like better than a
> full-fledged trackers is just a webapp that lists all the unreplied-to
> emails in the pgsql-bugs archives.
For something like a flexible archiving solution of mails, what about
having a look at ArchiveOpteryx, which offers IMAP service atop a
PostgreSQL database containing emails, along with full text search and
virtual search folders. And a web interface too.
http://www.archiveopteryx.org/
http://archives.aox.org/archives/pgsql-announce
I don't know the details because I'm yet to operate that, but it seems
like it could help us.
Regards,
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-06 22:08:27 | Re: Use of PG_VERSION |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-06 22:04:53 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |