| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, "pgsql-hackers\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |
| Date: | 2013-06-10 15:19:31 |
| Message-ID: | m21u8a9enw.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> While having one place to put everything sounds great, it doesn't do a
> whole lot of good if you consider conflicts- either because you want
> multiple versions available or because there just happens to be some
> overlap in function names (or similar). There are also extensions which
> have more than just functions in them but also tables, which increases
> the chances of a conflict happening. Having the extension authors end
> up having to prefix everything with the name of the extension to avoid
> conflicts would certainly be worse than actually using schemas.
Now you're not talking about *default* settings anymore, or are you?
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-06-10 15:20:13 | Re: JSON and unicode surrogate pairs |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-06-10 15:16:59 | Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes) |