Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: prlw1(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test
Date: 1999-05-17 09:02:46
Message-ID: m10jJIM-000EBZC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> >
> > The rules test is the only that fails for me under NetBSD/i386, and this
> > seems simply to be due to using a different userid. The expected result
> > has viewowner=pgsql, my result has viewowner=postgres. I suspect that had
> > I run "gmake runtest" as some other userid with access to the regression
> > database some of those rows may have had yet a different viewowner. Would
> > it be a good idea to omit viewowner in the test as per the following
> > patches? (Less luck on NetBSD/arm32 - looks similar to someone elses
> > posting for the mac port)
> >
>
> Sorry,
>
> me again due to latest changes - will fix.

Done.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-05-17 09:50:42 RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-05-17 08:51:42 Re: [HACKERS] select + order by