From: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com |
Cc: | prlw1(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test |
Date: | 1999-05-17 09:02:46 |
Message-ID: | m10jJIM-000EBZC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> >
> > The rules test is the only that fails for me under NetBSD/i386, and this
> > seems simply to be due to using a different userid. The expected result
> > has viewowner=pgsql, my result has viewowner=postgres. I suspect that had
> > I run "gmake runtest" as some other userid with access to the regression
> > database some of those rows may have had yet a different viewowner. Would
> > it be a good idea to omit viewowner in the test as per the following
> > patches? (Less luck on NetBSD/arm32 - looks similar to someone elses
> > posting for the mac port)
> >
>
> Sorry,
>
> me again due to latest changes - will fix.
Done.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 1999-05-17 09:50:42 | RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-05-17 08:51:42 | Re: [HACKERS] select + order by |