Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: prlw1(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test
Date: 1999-05-17 08:18:24
Message-ID: m10jIbQ-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> The rules test is the only that fails for me under NetBSD/i386, and this
> seems simply to be due to using a different userid. The expected result
> has viewowner=pgsql, my result has viewowner=postgres. I suspect that had
> I run "gmake runtest" as some other userid with access to the regression
> database some of those rows may have had yet a different viewowner. Would
> it be a good idea to omit viewowner in the test as per the following
> patches? (Less luck on NetBSD/arm32 - looks similar to someone elses
> posting for the mac port)
>

Sorry,

me again due to latest changes - will fix.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-05-17 08:27:26 Re: [HACKERS] Misleading Error Message
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-05-17 07:40:56 RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE does not drop a table completely