Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3 issues

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su (Vadim B(dot) Mikheev)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL HACKERS)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3 issues
Date: 1998-02-25 17:22:48
Message-ID: m0y7kXh-000BFRC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Jan Wieck wrote:
> >
> > > ScanKeyData missing initializations
> >
> > More details on missing initializations of ScanKeyData pleas.
> > Might have some time now since the other permission and setuid
> > things are delayed for 6.4.
>
> There was one place in selfuncs.c where scan key was initialized
> directly by assignment values to structure' fields
> (without ScanKeyEntryInitialize) and so new 6.3 fields were
> not initialized at all. One should check all code...

Haven't found any more places where sk_attno is assigned a
value and where no previous ScanKeyEntryInitialize() is
done. Think it's already fixed then.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian Beattie 1998-02-25 17:23:48 Help Wanted: Postgres GURU
Previous Message Hal Snyder 1998-02-25 17:12:26 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem