| From: | "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3 issues |
| Date: | 1998-02-25 23:00:41 |
| Message-ID: | 34F4A299.7E97E2D9@sable.krasnoyarsk.su |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> >
> > Jan Wieck wrote:
> > >
> > > > ScanKeyData missing initializations
> > >
> > > More details on missing initializations of ScanKeyData pleas.
> > > Might have some time now since the other permission and setuid
> > > things are delayed for 6.4.
> >
> > There was one place in selfuncs.c where scan key was initialized
> > directly by assignment values to structure' fields
> > (without ScanKeyEntryInitialize) and so new 6.3 fields were
> > not initialized at all. One should check all code...
>
> Haven't found any more places where sk_attno is assigned a
> value and where no previous ScanKeyEntryInitialize() is
> done. Think it's already fixed then.
Ok, but the problem was in un-initialized sk_func->fn_oid (sorry)...
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Danny White | 1998-02-25 23:08:30 | unsubscribe |
| Previous Message | Vadim B. Mikheev | 1998-02-25 22:55:49 | 6.X vacuum bug found & fixed |