Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh'

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh'
Date: 1998-02-24 15:45:00
Message-ID: m0y7MXY-000BFRC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > Actually, I'm not married to db_* for views...it was a "quick fix"
> > > to ensure that things still worked. Whatever we decide on, both Julie and
> > > Peter, at a minimum, need to know relatively soon. I know in Julie's
> > > case, she does do a call to pg_user...I let her know tonight that she
> > > needs to change it to db_user, for the *current* code...
> >
> > Good. I didn't want the db_ namespace pollution. I will call it
> > pg_user_no_passwd, and make it a view, not a rule. Is that OK with
> > everyone?
>
> Works for me...

How? When I create a view the way Bruce explained (update pg_class),
my backend crashes on SELECT FROM view during the rewrite. For some
reason the rewrite handler cannot get the rule locks correctly.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-02-24 15:47:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh'
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-02-24 15:19:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh'