On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Actually, I'm not married to db_* for views...it was a "quick fix"
> > to ensure that things still worked. Whatever we decide on, both Julie and
> > Peter, at a minimum, need to know relatively soon. I know in Julie's
> > case, she does do a call to pg_user...I let her know tonight that she
> > needs to change it to db_user, for the *current* code...
>
> Good. I didn't want the db_ namespace pollution. I will call it
> pg_user_no_passwd, and make it a view, not a rule. Is that OK with
> everyone?
Works for me...
> Are the only things you changed psql.c and initdb.sh?
Yes...