Re: Issue in recent pg_stat_statements?

From: David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issue in recent pg_stat_statements?
Date: 2021-06-29 17:25:57
Message-ID: lzy2asvaze.fsf@veeddrois.attlocal.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund writes:

> On 2021-04-26 12:53:30 -0500, David Christensen wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:18 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Using pg_stat_statements with a different query_id semantics without
>> > having to fork pg_stat_statements.
>> >
>>
>> I can see that argument for allowing alternatives, but the current default
>> of nothing seems to be particularly non-useful, so some sensible default
>> value would seem to be in order, or I can predict a whole mess of future
>> user complaints.
>
> +1

Just doing some routine followup here; it looks like cafde58b33 fixes
this issue.

Thanks!

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-29 17:59:38 Re: Add '--ignore-errors' into pg_regress
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-06-29 17:15:30 Re: Preventing abort() and exit() calls in libpq