| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: planet "top posters" section |
| Date: | 2010-04-19 07:29:45 |
| Message-ID: | l2u937d27e11004190029v508b21barf0a377e7bf0a12a0@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Robert Treat
> <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
>> Personally I think the top teams thing has caused more trouble/confusion than
>> any benefit it has produced, and at this point I think it could be dumped, and
>> with that our top 20 would become much more reasonable looking. imho.
>
> That'd be fine with me, too, as would any of the other suggestions so
> far offered.
I disagree - I like the teams feature.
How about just listing top posters and top teams separately, and not
including the people under each team. Maybe something like
Top posters
-----------------
Robert Treat (OmniTI) - 5
Andreas Scherbaum - 5
Magnus Hagander - 4
Dave Page (EnterpriseDB) -2
Bruce Momjian (EnterpriseDB) - 2
Top teams
----------------
OmniTI - 5
EnterpriseDB - 4
My only concern with that is that the poster names could become quite long.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-04-19 08:21:08 | Re: planet "top posters" section |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-19 01:56:45 | Re: planet "top posters" section |