Re: [GENERAL] Can I store bitmap graphics in a table?

From: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il>
To: Henning Hucke <hucke(at)braintec(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Can I store bitmap graphics in a table?
Date: 1998-07-28 09:21:13
Message-ID: l03110702b1e34833a79c@[147.233.159.109]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 11:06 +0300 on 28/7/98, Henning Hucke wrote:

>
> > [... Storing graphics in a postgresql db ...]
> > You can't. There is a limit on the tuple size, restricting it to 8k. If you
> > could guarantee that your images are no more than, say, 1K - I'd say you
> > can uuencode them or translate to hex, and put it in a text column. A byte
> > array is another option. But in the 50k to 100k, it's large objects.
>
> Even without having tried it I am rather shure that you are wrong. The 8k
> barrier applies AFAIK only to the normal datatypes like text and so. AFAIK
> the LOI is capable to store big graphics in the database.

Well, he asked for a way to do it as a normal datatype, without using the
(awkward) lo interface. Of course you can do it with LOs.

Herouth

--
Herouth Maoz, Internet developer.
Open University of Israel - Telem project
http://telem.openu.ac.il/~herutma

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-07-28 11:46:14 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Previous Message Herouth Maoz 1998-07-28 08:51:37 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products