Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Date: 2025-12-02 02:59:52
Message-ID: kx6zenuljidpia73jbjsbeyasv2ysh3sadfwjcgeihwlutf24r@vj2jzryrtf3y
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-12-02 11:46:56 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I doubt that we can drop this check yet. There are still a lot of
> places in the tree that need to be switched from off_t to pgoff_t,
> like the buffer APIs, etc.

Hm? What are you thinking about re buffer APIs?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-12-02 03:02:39 Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-12-02 02:46:56 Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB