Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Date: 2025-12-02 03:02:39
Message-ID: aS5WzzmLvlXuKbQp@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 09:59:52PM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2025-12-02 11:46:56 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I doubt that we can drop this check yet. There are still a lot of
>> places in the tree that need to be switched from off_t to pgoff_t,
>> like the buffer APIs, etc.
>
> Hm? What are you thinking about re buffer APIs?

buffile.h and buffile.c still have traces of off_t.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-12-02 03:05:52 Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-12-02 02:59:52 Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB