| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes) |
| Date: | 2026-01-12 17:45:03 |
| Message-ID: | kjdgvws34gpnz4y6xu5aaeul5mspgy3ahvyiw4lndb3ecsacdb@b2ccyowotpqh |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2026-01-09 13:08:43 +0500, Kirill Reshke wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 at 05:29, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> > I think 0001, 0002, 0003 can be committed. 0004, 0005 are new and probably
>
> 0001 LGTM.
>
> I also did look at 0002, looks sane.
Thanks for looking!
I've pushed 0001/0002 now. I fixed a typo or two since the last published
version.
I'm doing another pass through 0003 and will push that if I don't find
anything significant.
Also working on doing comment polishing of the later patches, found a few
things, but not quite enough to be worth reposting yet.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Artem Gavrilov | 2026-01-12 18:04:19 | Re: Timeline switching with partial WAL records can break replica recovery |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2026-01-12 17:30:38 | Re: [PATCH} Move instrumentation structs |