Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)

From: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)
Date: 2026-01-09 08:08:43
Message-ID: CALdSSPgyc7VuMLUZ8J7v2G-PebBa_vEi+mp-cLkcOwNycB56Hw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 at 05:29, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> I think 0001, 0002, 0003 can be committed. 0004, 0005 are new and probably

0001 LGTM.

I also did look at 0002, looks sane.

Other patches are out of my comprehension for now, I did not review them .

--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-01-09 08:11:09 Re: docs: clarify ALTER TABLE behavior on partitioned tables
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2026-01-09 08:04:42 Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication