Re: autoprewarm_dump_now

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daria Shanina <vilensipkdm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autoprewarm_dump_now
Date: 2025-06-03 18:58:42
Message-ID: kbv4jauor5mltu6blx7bov4c57gbjvptvakvyngdzizfn7clqf@minothylwk6e
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-06-03 13:17:43 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 6:07 AM Daria Shanina <vilensipkdm(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Some of our clients encountered a problem — they needed to allocate shared_buffers = 700 GB on a server with 1.5 TB RAM, and the error "invalid memory alloc request size 1835008000" occurred. That is, these are not mental exercises.
>
> I think the proposed patch should be committed and back-patched, after
> fixing it so that it's pgindent-clean and adding a comment. Does
> anyone have strong objection to that?

No, seems like a thing that pretty obviously should be fixed.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2025-06-03 19:02:07 Re: PATCH: jsonpath string methods: lower, upper, initcap, l/r/btrim, replace, split_part
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-06-03 18:47:11 Re: Add log_autovacuum_{vacuum|analyze}_min_duration