Re: autoprewarm_dump_now

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Daria Shanina <vilensipkdm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autoprewarm_dump_now
Date: 2025-06-06 13:18:48
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYM_=Jqo8dRSto2foqsxN5DPoMy_9P53pcYSFKzXD652A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 2:58 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > I think the proposed patch should be committed and back-patched, after
> > fixing it so that it's pgindent-clean and adding a comment. Does
> > anyone have strong objection to that?
>
> No, seems like a thing that pretty obviously should be fixed.

Done.

*quakes in fear of incoming buildfarm results*

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-06-06 14:17:07 Re: What's our minimum supported Python version?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-06-06 13:04:04 Re: Unnecessary connection overhead due copy-on-write (mainly openssl)