| From: | Robbie Harwood <rharwood(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq compression |
| Date: | 2019-02-13 19:34:50 |
| Message-ID: | jlgpnrv8oth.fsf@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> First of all thank you for attempting to push this patch, because
> there is really seems to be some disagreement which blocks progress of
> this patch. Unfortunately first reviewer (Robbie Harwood) think that
> my approach cause some layering violation and should be done in other
> way. Robbie several times suggested me to look "how the buffering in
> TLS or GSSAPI works" and do it in similar way. Frankly speaking I do
> not see some principle differences differences.
Hello,
In order to comply with your evident desires, consider this message a
courtesy notice that I will no longer be reviewing this patch or
accepting future code from you.
Thanks,
--Robbie
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-02-13 19:40:14 | Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-02-13 19:18:29 | Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions |