[OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?)

From: Lew <noone(at)lewscanon(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?)
Date: 2011-05-20 16:47:13
Message-ID: ir65ud$co1$1@news.albasani.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> "Strange, John W" wrote:
>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the
>> information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is
>> STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
>
> You probably already know this, but just to make sure -- you posted
> this to a public list which is automatically replicated to several
> websites freely available to everyone on the planet.

It's irrelevant, since that "STRICTLY PROHIBITED" verbiage is irrelevant,
unenforceable and legally meaningless. I could post that message on my
personal blog, being not the intended recipient myself, and they would b e
utterly powerless to do anything about it even if they sent it privately to my
personal email inbox.

I don't even know why people bother even putting such nonsense into their
emails, let alone Usenet or mailing-list posts.

--
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aren Cambre 2011-05-22 03:32:30 Re: Postgres refusing to use >1 core
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-05-20 03:52:10 Re: SORT performance - slow?