| From: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lew <noone(at)lewscanon(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?) |
| Date: | 2011-05-23 13:26:11 |
| Message-ID: | 4DDA6073.302@peak6.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 05/20/2011 11:47 AM, Lew wrote:
> I don't even know why people bother even putting such nonsense into
> their emails, let alone Usenet or mailing-list posts.
This may sound like a surprise, but many of us don't. Several companies
use an auto-append on any outgoing message not sent to an internal
recipient. You can see this for yourselves in this message, as my
company's little blurb gets attached after my signature lines. It's just
standard boilerplate meant as a CYA measure, really.
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer.php
for terms and conditions related to this email
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shaun Thomas | 2011-05-23 13:30:34 | Re: Performance degradation of inserts when database size grows |
| Previous Message | Pierre C | 2011-05-23 10:53:57 | Re: FW: KVP table vs. hstore - hstore performance (Was: Postgres NoSQL emulation) |