Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior

From: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior
Date: 2023-01-16 17:15:24
Message-ID: ff0eca938edff13d122b990001122dfc@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nikita Malakhov писал 2023-01-16 20:12:
> Hi,
>
> Currently there is no error in this case, so additional thrown error
> would require a new test.
> Besides, throwing an error here does not make sense - it is just a
> check for a vacuum
> permission, I think the right way is to just skip a relation that is
> not suitable for vacuum.
> Any thoughts or objections?
>

No objections for not throwing an error.

--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
Postgres Professional

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-01-16 17:37:23 Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?
Previous Message Karl O. Pinc 2023-01-16 17:14:35 Re: doc: add missing "id" attributes to extension packaging page