Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior

From: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior
Date: 2023-01-18 08:27:19
Message-ID: CAN-LCVO+Eh_V=PbJXXnvh-z7ScvLsLbjtN_HyifE+Zhrm6QS5Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi hackers!

Alexander found a very good issue.
Please check the solution above. Any objections? It's a production case,
please review,
any thoughts and objections are welcome.

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 8:15 PM Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
wrote:

> Nikita Malakhov писал 2023-01-16 20:12:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently there is no error in this case, so additional thrown error
> > would require a new test.
> > Besides, throwing an error here does not make sense - it is just a
> > check for a vacuum
> > permission, I think the right way is to just skip a relation that is
> > not suitable for vacuum.
> > Any thoughts or objections?
> >
>
> No objections for not throwing an error.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alexander Pyhalov,
> Postgres Professional
>

--
Regards,
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
https://postgrespro.ru/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-01-18 08:34:16 Re: Modify the document of Logical Replication configuration settings
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2023-01-18 08:27:02 Re: minor bug