| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Time to drop old-style (V0) functions? |
| Date: | 2016-12-19 20:13:42 |
| Message-ID: | fe519f25-1b85-68ca-9be5-277de2e8a7c5@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/9/16 7:52 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> It's kind of ironic, at least IMHO, that the DirectionFunctionCall
> macros are anything but direct. Each one is a non-inlined function
> call that does a minimum of 8 variable assignments before actually
> calling the function.
If this is a problem (it might be), then we can just make those calls,
er, direct C function calls to different function. For example,
result = DatumGetObjectId(DirectFunctionCall1(oidin,
CStringGetDatum(pro_name_or_oid)));
could just be
result = oidin_internal(pro_name_or_oid);
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-19 20:25:42 | Re: Time to drop old-style (V0) functions? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-12-19 19:08:32 | Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml |