Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml
Date: 2016-12-19 19:08:32
Message-ID: 2ab28bb3-287d-47ae-e7d9-d8aeb4a1fdbc@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/30/16 8:47 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> So maybe something like
>>
>> All the forms of ALTER TABLE that act on a single table,
>> except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into a
>> list of multiple alterations to be applied together.
>
> Updated patch attached.

Could you please rebase this patch? Some new stuff about partitions has
been added in the paragraph you are changing.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-12-19 20:13:42 Re: Time to drop old-style (V0) functions?
Previous Message David Fetter 2016-12-19 18:51:26 Re: pg_background contrib module proposal