Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
Date: 2018-01-02 22:47:50
Message-ID: fd1ae177-ea4f-c75c-c8a1-abcbd5a5a1bd@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/2/18 11:47, Tom Lane wrote:
> +1 --- seems like a new bool column is the thing. Or may we should merge
> "proisprocedure" with proisagg and proiswindow into an enum prokind?
> Although that would break some existing client-side code.

prokind sounds good. I'll look into that.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-02 22:52:37 Re: Contributing with code
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-01-02 22:23:58 Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL