Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I agree that we need this, but using prorettype = InvalidOid to do it
> might not be the best way, because it only works for procedures that
> don't return anything. If a procedure could return, say, an integer,

Good point, because that is possible in some other systems, and so
somebody is going to ask for it at some point.

> Anyway, I think it would be better to invent an explicit way to
> represent whether something is a procedure rather than relying on
> overloading prorettype to tell us.

+1 --- seems like a new bool column is the thing. Or may we should merge
"proisprocedure" with proisagg and proiswindow into an enum prokind?
Although that would break some existing client-side code.

PS: I still strongly disagree with allowing prorettype to be zero.

regards, tom lane