Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date: 2025-08-04 13:09:47
Message-ID: fb6ad8cf-9788-40e2-abc5-42689e448dcf@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-07-29 Tu 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> OK. I'm inclined to do this after the CF finishes, to avoid collisions
>> with other patches. I assume it's going to make the CFbot fairly unhappy.
> +1 for proceeding that way. (I did not look at whether the proposed
> changes are sane, but I agree that this'll inevitably break a lot of
> pending patches.)
>
>

Done.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-08-04 13:51:01 Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2025-08-04 12:57:47 Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT 'template')