From: | Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
Date: | 2025-09-01 10:35:12 |
Message-ID: | CA+v5N40gEq7CJHxUWo1Znbc9PjKWLv=bTjnr3Z8TvnWrdX8Zug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4 Aug 2025, at 4:09 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
On 2025-07-29 Tu 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
OK. I'm inclined to do this after the CF finishes, to avoid collisions
with other patches. I assume it's going to make the CFbot fairly unhappy.
+1 for proceeding that way. (I did not look at whether the proposed
changes are sane, but I agree that this'll inevitably break a lot of
pending patches.)
Done.
While working on this https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6020/
I discovered that when changing for func/func-aggregate.sgml, the HTML
wasn’t marked for update.
IIUC the doc/Makefile should be updated as attached, right ?
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
sgml-func-Makefile.patch | application/octet-stream | 580 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Geier | 2025-09-01 10:36:24 | Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc? |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-09-01 10:18:46 | Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends |