Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Date: 2016-08-30 00:54:33
Message-ID: fb09ec9f-e7fd-f614-7630-02a43f2ac1ed@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/29/16 12:54 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> As for the new names, how about pg_wal and
> pg_xact? I don't think "pg_trans" is as good; is it transactional or
> transient or transport or transitive or what?

pg_transaction_status? (or pg_xact_status if you want to keep it short)

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-08-30 00:58:01 Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-08-30 00:34:27 Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog