| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
| Date: | 2016-08-29 16:54:07 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZtkW0YxsrkCXh=bPFh2u3=GeFVvH2jHEO6o+ureQ03jQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> - Rename them, hard break is OK: Michael P, Bruce, Stephen (depends on
> David's input), Magnus
I'm in favor of this. But I don't like Peter's proposal to use a more
complicated structure. As for the new names, how about pg_wal and
pg_xact? I don't think "pg_trans" is as good; is it transactional or
transient or transport or transitive or what?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2016-08-29 17:00:43 | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2016-08-29 16:51:25 | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |