Re: popcount

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: popcount
Date: 2021-03-23 09:51:08
Message-ID: fabf4a9b-3671-4e48-24c3-1ec0bd5ef323@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21.03.21 02:31, David Fetter wrote:
>> I have now read the entire internet on what a suitable name for this
>> function could be. I think the emerging winner is BIT_COUNT(), which
>> already exists in MySQL, and also in Python (int.bit_count()) and Java
>> (Integer.bitCount()).
>
> Thanks for doing this tedious work. Please find attached the next
> version of the patch.

committing, with some polishing

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2021-03-23 10:01:42 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Amit Langote 2021-03-23 09:27:38 Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)