From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ? |
Date: | 2016-10-12 14:49:01 |
Message-ID: | fa33ec15-28f4-0dcd-83d1-00b834f77e2d@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/11/16 7:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> 1. Do nothing.
> 2. Remove the prosrc column from \df+ altogether.
> 3. Suppress prosrc for PL functions, but continue to show it for
> C and internal functions (and, probably, rename it to something
> other than "Source code" in that case).
> 4. #3 plus show PL function source code in footers.
One related annoyance I have with psql is that \d+ on a view *does* show
the "source code" in the footer, because it's often too long and bulky
and ugly and unrelated to why I wanted to use the +.
I'm OK with just removing all the source codes from the \d family and
using the \s family instead.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2016-10-12 14:54:49 | Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-10-12 14:30:41 | Re: Logical tape pause/resume |