Re: Sourceforge PG release

IMHO 65000 downloads are actually saying: "please don't remove the
project from this site because someone may find it useful"

gb.-

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Marc G. Fournier<scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
> What is the harm in keeping it?  Doesn't Google use 'relevant links metrics'
> to improve search results or something?  If the sf.net project just points
> to our own files, and we don't have to upload anything ... what is the
> issue?
>
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Fwiw, i think having an sf.net project is a *bad* idea anyway. It's
>>>> confusing for people who find that project and don't realise it's not
>>>> actually used for anything. It seems a strange thing to maintain
>>>> anyway - it's not exactly likely to attract new users.
>>>>
>>>
>>> yeah! i was wondering about the very same thing... what's the
>>> usefulness for maintaining a sf.net project?
>>
>> I don't know, but as long as it exists we should keep it current.  Do we
>> want to remove it?
>>
>> --
>>  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
>>  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>>
>>  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>>
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org                              MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
> Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
>