Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?
Date: 2026-10-02 14:54:31
Message-ID: f6d2fca1-1ee4-4d97-8219-100dd91d8496@aklaver.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/2/26 3:19 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 8:35 PM David G. Johnston
> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 4:56 PM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> A GLOBAL TEMP table (where the DBA runs the CREATE GLOBAL TEMP
> TABLE once (so that CREATE TEMP TABLE some_table  everywhere
> that my_func() is called) would also solve OP's problem.
>
>
> Per the create table docs:
>
> "Optionally, GLOBAL or LOCAL can be written before TEMPORARY or
> TEMP. This presently makes no difference in PostgreSQL and is
> deprecated; see Compatibility below."
>
> And I'm praying for "since future versions of PostgreSQLmight adopt a
> more standard-compliant interpretation of their meaning" in the
> Compatibility section you referenced.

As an extension there is:

https://github.com/darold/pgtt

>
> --
> Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
> Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
> <Redacted> lobster!

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2026-10-02 15:18:38 Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2026-10-02 10:19:20 Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?