Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?
Date: 2026-10-02 15:18:38
Message-ID: CANzqJaBfyF-F=q_kx3kwci_Sm_97NUg-ZrXG2ROBF0jUyqsX4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Oct 2, 2026 at 10:54 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 10/2/26 3:19 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 8:35 PM David G. Johnston
> > <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 4:56 PM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com
> > <mailto:ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
> >
> > A GLOBAL TEMP table (where the DBA runs the CREATE GLOBAL TEMP
> > TABLE once (so that CREATE TEMP TABLE some_table everywhere
> > that my_func() is called) would also solve OP's problem.
> >
> >
> > Per the create table docs:
> >
> > "Optionally, GLOBAL or LOCAL can be written before TEMPORARY or
> > TEMP. This presently makes no difference in PostgreSQL and is
> > deprecated; see Compatibility below."
> >
> > And I'm praying for "since future versions of PostgreSQLmight adopt a
> > more standard-compliant interpretation of their meaning" in the
> > Compatibility section you referenced.
>
> As an extension there is:
>
> https://github.com/darold/pgtt
>
>
Excellent. Thanks!

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thiemo Kellner 2026-10-04 19:27:34 Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2026-10-02 14:54:31 Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?