From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
Date: | 2017-08-19 02:47:49 |
Message-ID: | f67f36d7-ceb6-cfbd-28d4-413c6d22fe5b@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 8/17/17 21:22, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> It's not clear to me that this is better. Why do we need to use a
>> function that is clearly not the preferred API for this ("col" vs "loc")
>> just to get more entries?
> My argument for doing this is very simple: ICU/CLDR/BCP 47 provides
> stability guarantees for locales, not collations [1]. For example, as
> we discussed, de_BE didn't actually go away -- it just stopped being a
> distinct collation within ICU, for reasons that are implementation
> defined.
>
> I admit that there are arguments against this, but by far the most
> important consideration should be the stability of the names used for
> pg_collation entries created during initdb.
One argument I can think of is that it is confusing right now. Why is
there de-AT but no de-DE? I know why, but users in "DE" might not and
would be really confused. So I concede that adding the full set would
be useful.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-08-19 02:55:38 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-08-18 19:36:16 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-08-19 02:55:38 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-08-18 23:36:32 | Re: [PATCH] Pattern based listeners for asynchronous messaging (LISTEN/NOTIFY) |