From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
Date: | 2017-08-19 02:55:38 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=LyEY4JhaJdBcnUBXu-NO57ki+tZm-_qpTV60Cp9BKvw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 8/17/17 21:22, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>>> It's not clear to me that this is better. Why do we need to use a
>>> function that is clearly not the preferred API for this ("col" vs "loc")
>>> just to get more entries?
>> My argument for doing this is very simple: ICU/CLDR/BCP 47 provides
>> stability guarantees for locales, not collations [1]. For example, as
>> we discussed, de_BE didn't actually go away -- it just stopped being a
>> distinct collation within ICU, for reasons that are implementation
>> defined.
>>
>> I admit that there are arguments against this, but by far the most
>> important consideration should be the stability of the names used for
>> pg_collation entries created during initdb.
>
> One argument I can think of is that it is confusing right now. Why is
> there de-AT but no de-DE? I know why, but users in "DE" might not and
> would be really confused. So I concede that adding the full set would
> be useful.
Actually, there would be a de-DE. Just like with de-BE, that's ensured
by using locales rather than collations. See my self-contained test
program, or even the output I posted earlier.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | 302790951 | 2017-08-19 03:03:58 | BUG #14784: www_fdw extension is vulnerable |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-19 02:47:49 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-19 03:08:37 | Re: Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collation entries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-19 02:47:49 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |